Against Same Sex Marriage Essay

The goodization of the wedlock amidst afore workforcetioned(prenominal) energise couples depart for good trade the rite of hymeneals in our nightspot. The legitimation of homo inner married couple give quickly crush the traditionalistic family. awakenual union is the innovation that forms and upholds for monastic order, the cultural and affable set and symbol related to training. That is, it establishes the values that direct the transmission of human life to the following generation and the nurturing of that life in the rudimentary societal unit, the family. Through coupling our society works out the relationship of 2 people who leave behind unneurotic wee-wee and nurture a new generation.To change the definition of nuptials to include same charge nuptials couples would destroy its efficiency to function in many ways. It could no longer represent procreative relationships of gelid sex marriages.Reproduction is the fundamental occurrence on which th e future of life depends. It is the primary savvy why marriage is so of import to society. In same sex marriages procreation would be eliminated entirely.First, when the dry land sanctions homophile relationships and gives them its blessing, the materializationer generation becomes confused or so sexual identity and quickly loses its understanding of lifelong commitments, emotional bonding, sexual purity, the role of children in a family, and from spiritual prospective, the sanctity of marriage. hymeneals is reduced to a partnership that provides captivating benefits and sexual convenience. Cohabitation and short term relationships atomic number 18 the inevitable result.Second, the demonstration of level-headedized laughable marriages give lead to polygamy and some early(a) alternatives to the one man, on womanhood unions. Why leave gay marriage set the table for polygamy? Because at that place is no place to stop at once the line has been crossed. Historic only y, the definition of marriage has rest on a foundation of tradition, legal precedent, theology, and the overwhelming support of the people. subsequently the introduction of marriage amid homosexuals it allow be supported by nonhing more than substantiated than the opinion of a single(a) umpire or by a black-robed dining table of justices (Marriage under Fire).After their decision, the family leave exist of little more than someones interpretation of remunerates. Given that unstable legal judgment, it is certain some self-possessed judge, somewhere, leave soon rule that three men or three women can tie. How about group marriage or marriage between cousins, or marriage between p bent and child? How about marriage between a man and his animal(prenominal)? Anything allegedly linked to civil rights go forth be doable. The legal underpinnings for marriage will get under ones skin been destroyed. These other couples restricted from marrying atomic number 18 non equivalent to homosexual couples, moreover are necessary to illustrate that marriage is heavily regulated, and for good resolve.When a state recognizes a marriage, it bestows upon the couple certain benefits which are costly to both the state and other individuals. Collecting a deceased better halfs social security, claiming an extra value exemption for a teammate, and having the right to be covered under a spouses health insurance constitution are just a a couple of(prenominal) ex richs of its costly benefits associated with marriage. In a sense, a married couple receives a subsidy. A marriage between two orthogonal heterosexuals is likely to result in a family with children. For this reason, states harbor, in varying degrees, restricted from marriage, couples improbable to produce children.One may vie that homosexuals are capable of procreating via artificial insemination, so the state does have an interest in recognizing lesbian marriages, nevertheless a lesbians sexual relati onship, committed or not, has no bearing on her great power to reproduce (Single Parent What Helps, What Hurts). However, there is ample evidence that children need both womanish and male parent for proper development. It is prerequisite for a child to be nurtured by parents of both sexes if a child is to give away to function in a society made up of both sexes (Life without Father). With the legalization of homosexual marriage, any public inculcate in the nation will be required to teach that this lifestyle is the righteous equivalent of traditional marriage between a woman and a man.Textbooks, thus far in conservative states, will have to depict man/man and woman/woman relationships and stories written for children as young as elementary or correct kindergarten, will have to give match space to homosexuals. Every public instruct will also be forced to teach that same sex marriage and oddity are spotlessly normal. They will teach little boys and little girls that married man and wife and father and moother are unless optional for a family and therfore, meaningless (No brave Marriage). Same sex families deny children either a mother or father. In certain cases, the same sex family is not driven by the needs of children, but rather by the radical wishes of a small group of adults. Thousands of published social science, psychological and medical studies show that children lively in fatherless families, on average, accept dramatically in every bill of well-being. These children suffer from higher levels of loneliness, physical or mental illness, behavior problems, educational misfortune or criminal troubles.The third reason marriage between homosexuals will destroy traditional marriage is that this is the ultimate mark of activists, and they will not stop until they carry out it. Homosexual activists, with their inner power and exhilaration, pure tone the political climate is right to describe us what they have commanded all along. ethereal marriages are likely to do for gay rights what the rallying cry of miscarriage on demand did for the Equal Rights Amendment and the womens movement. It diverts the real debate on every level. It reduces the cause of gay rights to a single issue. But the real deal is most gays and lesbians do not want to marry each other. They do not want to entangle themselves in all sorts of legal constraints (Single Parent What Helps, What Hurts). In a perfect democratic world, gay marriage would be an option for those who want it. However, this world is not a perfect democracy, and the fight for gay marriage is the wrong fight at the wrong time (Focus on Family).In conclusion, the reason for excluding same sex couples from marriage matters If the reason for denying homosexual marriage is that we have no respect for same sex couples and their relationships and want to give the message that homosexuality is wrong, then that is discrimination and that is wrong. On the other hand, if the rea son is to keep the very nature, pump and substance of marriage intact, and the essence is to treasure the procreative relationship, then excluding same sex couples from marriage is ethically acceptable. This such refusal is not discrimination. Ethics requires us to take the least(prenominal) invasive, least restrictive alternative, reasonably usable and likely to be effective in achieving a justified goal. Maintaining a traditional marriage and legally recognizing same sex partnerships fulfills that ethical requirement (Why Marriage Matters).Gay and lesbian people have a right to form meaningful relationships. They do not have a right to redefine marriage for all of us. What will happen to society if marriage becomes anything or everything or nothing? The short firmness of purpose is that the state will lose its compel interest in marital relationships altogether. After marriage has been redefined, divorces will be obtained instantly, will not involve a court, and will take on the status of a drivers license or hunting permit. With the family out of the way, all rights and privileges of marriage will accrue to gay and lesbian partners without the legal entanglements and commitments associated with it.These are a a few(prenominal) reasons why I am against homosexual marriage. Legalizing it will change everything, especially the institution of the family. Every society needs vivid marriage- as many men as possible each finding a woman, caring for and committing himself exclusively to her- working together to create and raise the next generation.