Not Either an Experimental Doll

Ryan Shellady Professor Mtisi Paideia October 31st, 2012 Placing Fault A Look at Determining Who is to Blame for Lily Moyas Downf all told in not all an observational Doll The Separate Worlds of Three S extincth Afri rat Women In todays Western culture, it is hard to imagine a do master(prenominal) without education. Adults and children alike view education as a common drill that is essential to everyday life. For Lily Moya, this is not the case. In Not Either an Experimental Doll, edited by Shula Marks, garners of correspondence reveal a kind amongst Dr.Mabel Palmer, a well-known European supporter of black education, and Lily Moya, a missy growing up in apartheid South Africa. Lily writes to Palmer requesting acceptance into a school. Due to Lilys amusing writing style, Palmer feels a connection to her. In turn, Palmer decides to find a way to fund Lilys education. Throughout the letters, Lily alludes to this thought that she desires a more(prenominal) intimate friendship with Palmer however, Palmer continues to assertively state that the blood Lily seeks is impossible.In the end of the correspondence, Dr. Palmer releases her sponsorship from Lilys education which means Lily substructure no longitudinal attend school. For these two reasons, some critics will argue that Palmer is to blame for Lilys mental breakdown at the end of the book. These stack ar simulated Mabel Palmers actions are not to blame for what happens to Lily. Fault lies in the differing cultures betwixt Lily and Palmer, and in Lilys stubbornness, egoism, and her inability to follow simple instructions.It is easy to empathise that there are inevitable differences in culture between a European woman in her seventies and a fifteen-year-old African girl living in apartheid-ruled South Africa. In the introduction of the book, editor and secure in the field of South African studies Shula Marks articulates that the cultural differences between Lily and Dr. Palmer make for a diff icult examineing of correspondence etiquette. Not surprisingly, the valetly concern of the busy academic was remote from the concerns of a l integrityly and aspirant fifteen-year-old in Umtata.For Lily, still living in a world in which misadventure was explained in call of single(a) wickedness and witchcraft, Mabels failure to retort could further be the result of the evil counsel of her advisers (Marks 18). Lily has been raised in a place where academia is not prominent. To understand why Dr. Palmer didnt reply swiftly and quickly to each of Lilys letters, Lily would have to understand all the work Dr. Palmers occupation entails. Lily would have to realize that people are some sequences simply besides busy to write however, as Marks notes, Dr.Palmers failure to reply was likely explained to Lily in terms of individual wickedness. Later in the same paragraph of the introduction, Marks goes on to describe Palmers point of view. For Mabel, Lilys intense if adolescent spectr al experience was to appear as religiosity and self-importance-righteous, while she had clog remembering whether her protegee was an Anglican or a Catholic, and had no idea that she was Xhosa, not Zulu (Marks 18). Palmer is under the impression that she understands Lilys pratground, except Marks exposes Palmers ignorance of Lilys culture.This lack of knowledge leads to poor communication between Lily and Palmer. However, Palmer does endeavor to lessen her ignorance by asking Lily to write a paper, The Life of a inborn Girl in a Native Reserve (Marks 87). In this paper, Palmer asks Lily to spot activities, problems, and daily routines experienced by a girl living in Lilys society. Due to this attempt, Palmers failure to comprehend Lilys expectations can be acquitn. Palmer tries to understand Lily and her cover songground, but Lily cannot communicate any information in return.In the strikinger scheme, neither Lily nor Palmer is to blame for cultural variances. The only thin g at fault in this particular case is that the two grew up in completely different environments. Circumstance is not solely to blame, however. In other cases, Lilys soulal faults are too to blame. The first of Lilys individual weaknesses that lead to her demise is stubbornness it plays a large role in why Palmer has such a difficult time dealing with Lily. On a number of occasions by means of the correspondence, Lily attempts to treat Palmer as though the two of them are close, intimate friends.Lily even goes as far as saying to Palmer, I hope you stay for years, with me (Marks 113). If this is not pressure bounteous, Lily goes on to guilt Palmer by proclaiming, You cannot leave me al integrity in this merciless world (Marks 113). When faced with these remarks, she needed to address Lilys outlook on their relationship to make sure Lily understood that their interaction had to remain professional. You say that angiotensin converting enzyme of your reasons for wishing to be in D urban is that you want to see more of me, but have you ever asked yourself whether I wish do see more of you?As a matter of fact I do not. Your amatory and self-centered imagination has built up for you a picture in which you are to be my devoted and intimate friend. Now you must forgive me for saying that this is all nonsense. Even if you were a European girl of your fester it would still be nonsense (Marks 136). Palmer makes it very clear that Lilys feelings for her are simply not reciprocated. Palmer says she does not wish to see Lily, and that Lilys science of their connection is just nonsense. Critics will argue that Palmers tint here is too aggressive though.Theyll argue that Palmer should have anticipated that her address would hurt Lily deeply. Theyll back up their assertions with quotations like the undermentioned where Lily jumps to drastic conclusions close Palmer not responding swiftly enough. Your silence impresses me severely, in so much that forbearance fails m e (Marks 87). Im truly worried now. It is a long time I have been waiting for yours letter (Marks 91). One might claim that Lily displays great sensitivity and anxiety be eccentric of Palmer.These critics therefore argue that if waiting for a solution from Palmer ca uses Lily this much distress, then it should be obvious to Palmer that critical words would cause Lily worse sorrow and anguish. These critics are wrong for two reasons. First, Lily still goes on to address Palmer on January 28th, February 6th, and again on February 16th of 1951 (Marks 143-145). All of these dates are after Palmers direct note from page 136 mentioned previously. Lily did not fulfill a letter from Palmer between these three instances.It is fair to say that Palmers annoyance is justified when she very recently asked Lily to respect boundaries. Secondly, the quotes these critics may use do not show that Lily is sensitive rather they show that Lily is glowing and bullheaded. Lily keeps writing to Palmer so Palmer does not neglect her promise to help Lily puddle into school. Lily actually reminds Palmer of this promise. So, please do not forget your promise that you would rank me to school to complete the Matriculation Course (Marks 94).Because Palmer does not write back quickly, Lily is worried that she isnt getting her way, and stubbornly writes other letter out of impatience. Lilys stubbornness to both get her way and to create a friendship that is deeper than a professional level shows a character defacement that certainly leads to her downfall. Lily cannot accept anything less than her own expectations when she is faced with a disappointment, she spirals into a depression. Stubbornness is not the only character flaw ahead(p) to Lilys downfall though. When Palmer addresses Lily about their relationship, she notes that Lily is self-centered.Lilys egocentrism is yet another trait that ultimately leads to her breakdown. Palmer is correct when she states that Lily writes amusi ngly when it is about herself. Looking back over my correspondence with you I realize that you only write interestingly and amusingly when you are writing about yourself (Marks 138). For example, in Lilys letter written on the 26th of January, 1949, the tone she uses in her writing has a pleading, supplicateging feel because it is one Lily is writing to further her own attempt at finding an education.Kindly sympathize with me, a lost orphan, I beg you I can be very glad if you answer me at your earliest possible and please I beg you do sympathise with. You can only show your sympathy by taking me to a college where I shall work with my level best my school work, and, Im sure Ill please you in any way in my character (Marks 59). For being a student with so little education, Lily really shows finesse in her writing ability. Her use of description in the helpless orphan bit tugs at Palmers heartstrings. Lily is even smart enough to know that tone and word choice an sway a persons eth os, but like Palmer says, Lily only uses this for personal gain. Palmer, however, is not the only person that notices Lilys egocentrism. Palmer notes that one of Lilys caretakers also feels that Lily focuses on self too much. I understand Mrs Bomback thinks that she Lily is already inclined to think too much of herself (Marks 128). Lilys self-centered personality is clearly not seen by Palmer alone. This egocentrism leads Lily to see only her own needs in Palmer. When Palmer revokes her patronage, Lily sees it as a great personal loss.This is yet another fault leading Lily to her mental breakdown at the end of the correspondence moreover, it also leads to her obstacle following rules. An inability to follow instructions has already been demonstrated in Lilys inability to accept a non-personal friendship with Palmer. This is, in fact, one of many instances in which Lily defies rules. In one instance, upon being told not to do so, Lily entered a men Lecturers hostel with the purpose of receiving a lesson from one of them (Marks 133). This is a clear violation of rules laid out by caretaker Mrs.Bomback. In another instance Lily was expected to come to an appointment with Palmer, yet she failed to show up (Marks 183). Arriving at an appointment punctually is an easy undertaking to accomplish, yet Lily failed to do as she was told. This reason alone is one that Palmer lists as a reason for revoking funding for Lilys education. Palmer confronts Lily twice for not following directions (Marks 136 161). It is very clear to see that obstinate behavior causes Palmer to withdraw her funding leading to Lilys mental break down.Some argue that Palmers pulling out is ultimately to blame for Lilys downward spiral. It is easy to see how lead these people are if one considers that Palmer never wished to stop funding Lilys education. She went out of her way to ask Sibusisiwe Makhanya for help to try and repair the problems Lily had been face (Marks 121-122). It was only whe n Lily continued to break rules and disrespect Palmers wishes that Palmer had to quit. Lily made herself a lost cause. Is it fair to blame Palmer for Lilys affairs after Palmer pass money out of her own pocket to assist Lily in all of her needs?No, it is absolutely absurd to claim Palmer is at fault. In Not Either an Experimental Doll, it is clear to see that Dr. Mabel Palmer is not to blame for Lilys depressed state. Circumstance is responsible for the cultural differences between the two main characters throughout the correspondence. It is easy to identify Lilys sense of stubbornness through her insistent attempts at making an intimate friendship with Palmer. Lilys egocentrism shows in how her writing style changes depending upon whether she is writing about herself or others.It also is fair to call Lily egocentric due to the fact that more than one person identified her self-centered personality. An inability to follow instructions is unmingled in different examples and Palmer notes that this is a reason why she terminated her sponsorship for Lily. Critics can continue to argue that Palmer is to blame for Lilys psychiatric state, but ultimately the circumstances in which the two grew up, and Lily herself, are truly at fault. full treatment Cited Shula, Marks, ed. Not Either and Experimental Doll. Bloomington and Indianapolis Indiana UP, 1987. Print.