The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms Essay -- Gun Bear Arms C

The Second Amendment And The Right To Bear ArmsThroughout the years there has been an ongoing take over the Second Amendment and how it should be construe. The issue that is being debated is whether our judicature has the right to regulate hoagys. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one moldiness also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be rock-bottom and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law these citizens nonplus up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted. The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights statesA well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Amendment II 1791)This debate has produced two familiar interpretations of the Second Amendment. Advocates of stricter gun control laws have tended to stress that the amendments militia clause guarantees nothing to the individual and that it only protects the states rights to be able to maintain organized military units. These people argue that the Second Amendment was merely used to place the states organized military forces beyond the federal governments power to be able to disarm them. This would guarantee that the states would always have sufficient force at their command to abolish federal restraints on their rights and to resist by arms if necessary. T... ... stricter gun control, the states are moving in a different direction. The reason behind this action is that the constitutionality of tighter gun control laws is worthy a question. Once the Supreme Court of the United States answers this question on the legality of infringing on the right to bear arms we will know what our pick out right is.Works Cited1 Cottrol, Robert, ed. Gun Control and the Constitution Sources and Explorations on the Second Amendment. New York Garland Publishing Inc., 19942 Dowlut, Robert. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in State Bills of Rights and Judicial Inte rpretation. SAF 19933 Freedman, Warren. The Privilege to Keep and Bear Arms. Connecticut Quorum Books, 1989 4 Hickok, Eugene Jr., ed. The Bill of Rights Original Meaning and Current Understanding. Virginia University Press of Virginia, 19915 Kruschke, Earl PHD. Gun Control A character reference Handbook. California ABC-CLIO Inc., 19956 Image on the cover page taken from TIME. Photographer unknown.7 Prune Yard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 81 (1980)8 Zimring, Franklin E., Gun Control. Encyclopedia Encarta 1993-1997 Microsoft Corporation.